New school funding data has revealed that Australia’s most disadvantaged government schools receive at least $10,000 less per student in government funding than equivalent Catholic schools.
The 2016 funding figures, released by ACARA after a Freedom of Information (FOI) request by the Australian Education Union (AEU), categorise the funding data by school sector and by the Index of Community and Socio-educational Advantage (ICSEA) score. ICSEA is a measure of student need.
AEU Federal President Correna Haythorpe said this data was more proof that Prime Minister Scott Morrison has abandoned Australia’s 2.5 million public school students.
“The evidence shows that Australia’s most disadvantaged government schools receive less government funding than Catholic and Independent schools in the same area,” Ms Haythorpe said. “This is astonishing. Prime Minister Scott Morrison said his plan is needs- based, but clearly he hasn’t looked at the national data which tells a very different story.”
ICSEA is a scale that measures education advantage. On this scale, a figure of 1000 represents an ‘average’ school score. The lower the score, the more disadvantage a school experiences. According to the ACARA data, all public schools in disadvantaged areas receive less government funding than Catholic schools.
“National data shows that the most disadvantaged government schools are receiving the least help from the government, compared to the private sector,” Ms Haythorpe said. “The gap can be up to $10,000 per student, which for a school of 250 students would equate to $2.5 million per year. This is absolutely astounding.”
“This is just more proof that Prime Minister Morrison has abandoned Australia’s 2.5 million public school students,” Ms Haythorpe said.
“While Mr Morrison’s attention has been on finding a political solution to his problems with the Catholic education sector, what the ACARA data clearly shows us is that the federal government is providing more funding to disadvantaged non-government schools than to equivalent public schools.”
“This makes a mockery of PM Morrison’s sector-blind, needs-based rhetoric,” Ms Haythorpe said. “This data actually demonstrates the opposite of what the Prime Minister claims to support, and once again exposes his hypocrisy when it comes to public school funding.”
“Many of the most disadvantaged public schools in Australia are in regional and remote areas,” Ms Haythorpe said. “Why do the most disadvantaged private schools receive on average $10,000 per student more in government funding than the most disadvantaged public schools?”
“Data from the Australian Bureau of Statistics shows that public schools teach 74% of children in outer regional areas, 77.5% of children in remote areas and 88% in very remote areas. It is the children in public schools in these regions which are missing out on vital resources”
Ms Haythorpe said that fair funding for public schools will be a crucial issue in the upcoming federal election.
“Public schools need a fair go for funding, not a Prime Minister who clearly prioritises private schools and denies every child the opportunity to make their dreams come true,” Ms Haythorpe said.
“There are state elections looming in Victoria and New South Wales, as well as a federal election. Public school funding is going to be a critical issue in all of these. Parents in public school communities understand the importance of fully funding public schools, and they vote.”
“Current federal funding arrangements will leave nearly nine in ten public schools in Australia without enough funding to meet the needs of each student by 2023,” Ms Haythorpe said. “It’s clear what needs to happen. The Morrison government must lift its contribution to public school funding.”
“The Morrison government must reverse its $1.9 billion cut from public schools for the 2018 and 2019 years, remove the 20% cap for public schools on its share of the SRS, and reverse cuts to disability funding in five states and territories.”
MEDIA CONTACT: NICK BUCHAN, 0418 288 104